The color conversion functions are written in a very abstract form (as close to Haskell as I could) as to be reproducible in other languages and just darn better to read. My reasoning for CoffeeScript is to allow this repository to serve as a learning resource as well as a tool for those who would like to improve it. It is designed to be run, not only online, but offline.
Simply put, color-me-shocked is a color converter that updates in real-time as you type into multiple color formats all at once. With a peaking interest in color theory and a "kill tons of birds with one stone" attitude, I sat down to solve this problem. This got rather tedious and all the flipping back and forth was making me work too hard. "Is Microsoft good or bad" is a trick question, it's a blind self-feeding machine.Before color-me-shocked, I had to go to Google, type "rgb to hex" or "hex to rgb" or "hsv to cmyk." Then input my value and then hit "convert." That's like 4 steps. But your good intentions were ultimately irrelevant, because filtered through bad incentives they created emergent evil. lynx seems to use GnuTLS for accessing TLS websites, but gnutls-cli accepts the cert just fine, while lynx does not. You earnestly suggested these security measures in good faith so you will of course defend them and be adamant that their purpose is security. Posted 4:19 UTC (Tue) by pabs (subscriber, 43278) Link My question was about lynx not accepting the TLS certificate of, not about JavaScript. Color me shocked - not - Obama is not going to go the public financing route after promising he would By ShrNfr Politics June 2008 Views: 104 Obama has just said no to public campaign financing and said yes to all the money that the Chicago machine and Georgie boy can raise for him. Which of these do you think will be at the bottom of the list? The measures start to roll out and you receive backlash. Posted 19:09 UTC (Fri) by Wol (subscriber, 4433) Link I dunno about 'emergent evil', but there is also 'responsibility to your stake holders', which is a legal obligation, and is rarely thought through by legislators. Your boss is tasked with picking which of these things should be the companies priority this year. Some of them require additional work in Windows, some of them require work from vendors and some would be easy to enable but require extra development to make work well with other operating systems. You propose to a wide array of security measures. I think this is the most useful framework to think about these things.įor example, imagine you are in charge of security at Microsoft. > There's something with corporations I like to call "emergent evil" also, don't change other settings because they might really make your system less secure."Īnd now, add in "some systems might not even have this setting. it will probably have a warning telling you not to change it. change this one setting, which will have some name that sounds related to what we're talking about.
something with 'boot', or 'security', or something".Īdd in "now, in this security section, find, like, the most obscure sub-section you can. it will be different from computer to computer. we don't know what that section is called. And what key it is will be different".Īdd in "once you are in the settings, you'll get some weird gui, or maybe a text interface which, if you are old enough, you will remember as how your parents may have used computers"Īdd in "okay, look around for a section that might have the relevant settings. really fast though, before it does other stuff.
#Color me shocked install#
It is hard enough for people to do a Linux install (even if they're not making the problem even harder for themselves by wanting preserve and dual-boot Windows on the same system).Īdding in "change your BIOS setting" is a big hurdle.Īdd in "how you get to your BIOS settings is different on every computer! you probably hit a key during startup. There's a checkbox in the BIOS to enable the third-party key if you want.
0 kommentar(er)
